Showing posts with label Book Thieves. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Book Thieves. Show all posts

Monday, July 15, 2013

Book Heisters & Gangbusters: The Notorious Rare Book Thieves of New York And Their Nemesis

by Stephen J. Gertz


There was Babyface Mahoney, who made the libraries of New England his playground; the Swede; Harry Gold, whose scouts were not Baden-Powell boys yet still tied the cops into knots; "Doctor" Harold Clarke, whose Ph.D was in larceny and logorrhea; the Southerner Dupree, who'd steal almost anything; the thief known only as Paul, a nimble lifter who could jump through a library window with the loot if need be; Ben Harris, the Dane who sold illegal erotica, was savvy, fearless, and knew the score. There was Jack Brocher, who hijacked Connecticut, tipped it over, and poured its rare books into New York; Oscar the fence Chudnowsky; the shadowy master thief known as Hilderwald, Hilderman, or Hilderbrand, a literary tourist on the wrong path who checked into the Library of Congress and checked out with rarities purloined as if they were hotel toiletries and towels; and more members of the crew, desperado biblioklepts all.

And then there was Charles Romm, who, with fire hydrant physique and the face and temperament of Al Capone, led this gang responsible for a five year tsunami of rare book thievery at Columbia University Library, Harvard Library, the New York Public Library, Boston Public Library, and almost every other public and private library in the Northeast, the many small town libraries easy pickin's. The books were scoured of obvious ID and then made their way to Book Row on New York City's Fourth Avenue, six long city blocks lined with the greatest concentration of secondhand book shops in the world. From Book Row the literary swag went up the food chain onto the shelves or into the back rooms of upscale rare and antiquarian booksellers in uptown Manhattan who weren't too picky about provenance, looked the other way, or were duped. The years 1926-1931 were open season for book hunters of dubious character stealing and/or dealing in hot rare books.

But G. William Bergquist, Special Investigator for the NYPL with a bloodhound nose and terrier disposition, was on their trail.

The beginning of the end for the outfit began with a copy of Poe's scarce Al Aaraaf, Tamerlane, and Minor Poems (1829). On Saturday, January, 10, 1931 Harry Gold sent the Southerner Dupree to the NYPL to steal the library's precious copy with the Swede and Paul as back-up in case Dupree, on his first caper, got the willies. That he did but managed to make a mad dash for the exit without slipping on the sweat flooding out of his pores and onto the floor; library staff were right behind him. But not right enough. An hour after the Southerner's close call  Al Aaraaf  was in Gold's hands.

As Travis McDade, author of The Book Thief: The True Crimes of Daniel Spiegelman, and curator of rare books at the University of Illinois College of Law writes in his new book, Thieves of Book Row: New York's Most Notorious Rare Book Ring and the Man Who Stopped It, Bergquist's pursuit of Al Aaraaf  (he was as anxious to retrieve it as he was to nail the perp) led to the unraveling of the Romm Gang. Significantly, the case spurred libraries across the country to beef up security, which, at the time, was, to put it delicately, in its infancy.

And book theft had been, until this episode, casually treated by the police and lightly prosecuted. Book thieves were considered to be mentally ill, at the mercy of an uncontrollable passion, the "gentle madness" that Nicholas A. Basbanes has written so well about. Book thieves were finally considered to be criminals and, in New York, accommodations at Sing-Sing now awaited the convicted.

As McDade makes clear in this exhaustively researched book - 185 pages of text with twenty-three pages of notes - book theft was nothing new. Its roots stretch back to the mid-nineteenth century when the first public libraries in the U.S. were established, and library theft has always attracted colorful characters. No less so were the rare and antiquarian booksellers who were actively or passively complicit in the traffic in stolen books. Those with a nose for trade history may be startled to see many familiar names from the past and learn that some of those, amongst the most respected dealers in the U.S., were not averse to acquiring books warm to the touch. The rare book trade has always been a capital-intensive, feast or famine business with even the most successful dealers often on the brink of disaster. It's a great passion but a tough way to earn a living. The temptation to acquire books at suspiciously low prices once loomed large and the quest for legitimate bargains remains an ongoing imperative. Idealists who enter the trade are soon disillusioned; purity is for Ivory soap. This is hard commerce.

Thieves of Book Row, published by Oxford University Press, is a scholastic book that wants to be a popular true crime narrative and, to a large extent, it succeeds. There is rough going at first as McDade tries to wrestle the wealth of material into submission and draw us in. The sins of academic writing are difficult to exorcise but McDade, who teaches a class at University of Illinois on Rare Books, Crime & Punishment, soon loosens up, hits his stride, and the story takes off with a delightful dose of wit, a broad splash of color, and rich details and anecdotes.

Example: Adolf Stager, owner, with his son, of the Cadmus Bookshop, routinely and curiously wore his hat and coat at all times while in the shop. Why? He was on disability insurance and not allowed to work so he maintained a full-time facade that he was simply visiting his son at the store in case the authorities dropped by to check on him.

Bandits, rascals and rogues; good guys, scholars, and strugglers; individualists, misfits, and the melancholy: the rare book trade's personnel department never has to recruit, we just show up. The feral bandits have been tamed, if not domesticated, since trade associations emerged in the mid-20th century and established codes of ethics, which even non-association members tend to follow; it's just good business. The fact that book theft is now considered a serious crime with serious consequences has tempered the temptation for stealer and receiving dealer alike. The overwhelming number of rare and antiquarian booksellers are on the square and perhaps the worst that can be said about a dealer's behavior reiterates Chico Marx's reply in A Day At The Races when Groucho asks if he can trust Harpo.

"Sure, he's honest," Chico says, "but you gotta watch him a little."

I love the trade and our cast of characters. And I loved this book, a chronicle of Booktown's  Depression-era mean streets when literary culture met organized crime.
__________

McDADE, Travis. Thieves of Book Row. New York's Notorious Rare Book Ring and the Man Who Stopped It. New York: Oxford University Press, (June) 2013. First edition. Octavo. xi, [1], 216 pp. Black cloth, gilt-lettered spine. Dust jacket. $27.95.
__________
__________

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

The Case Of The Purloined Letter And The (Allegedly) Stolen Bible, Part Two.

Detail From: T'oros Roslin (active:1256 - 1268)
Canon Tables of the Zeyt' un Gospels, 1256.
Tempera colors, gold paint,
and ink on
parchment.

(Image Courtesy Of The J. Paul Getty Museum.)

Ask any bookstore owner or librarian which book is most frequently stolen from their shelves, and the answer is likely to be: "The Bible." Surprising perhaps, but as bookstore owner Steve Bercu told the New York Times: "Some people think the word of God should be free." But even that doesn't entirely explain it. The manager of an Oregon Christian bookstore complained of Bible snatching despite the fact that the store gives anyone who asks a free copy. But even given the apparent legions of light-fingered gospel grabbers, this recent news headline packs a wallop: Armenian Church Sues Getty Over Stolen Bible Pages.

A lawsuit pits Western Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church of America, a branch of the oldest national Christian Church in the world, against the J. Paul Getty Museum, one of the wealthiest and most influential art museums on earth. The dispute: who is the rightful owner of seven pages ripped from a 13th century illuminated manuscript known as the Zeyt’un Gospels. In the civil complaint filed by the Church, the Getty is said to be "wrongfully in possession" of seven key pages of the holy book, known collectively as the "canon tables of the Zeyt’un Gospels," which the museum "knew, or should have known, were stolen." (Strangely enough the legal document (.pdf file) in its entirety is available from--of all places--Harvey Levin's online gossip rag, tmz.com.)

T'oros Roslin (active:1256 - 1268)
Canon Tables of the Zeyt' un Gospels, 1256.
Tempera colors, gold paint,
and ink on
parchment.

(Image Courtesy Of The J. Paul Getty Museum.)

The redress sought by the Armenian Church proves that the Bible in question is not exactly the kind the Gideons leave in every nightstand at your local Motel 6: they are suing the Getty not only for the return of the disputed seven pages, but also for punitive damages in the amount of $105 million dollars. The Zeyt’un Gospels are not just a cultural treasure to Christians in Armenia: they are a reminder of the horrific death toll and nationwide devastation wrought by the 1915 Armenian genocide, and are even thought to possess supernatural magic powers.

T'oros Roslin (active:1256 - 1268)
Canon Tables of the Zeyt' un Gospels, 1256.
Tempera colors, gold paint,
and ink on
parchment.

(Image Courtesy Of The J. Paul Getty Museum.)

The Church writes in their legal filing that during the darkest days of the Armenian genocide the Zeyt’un Gospels were "paraded...through every street in Zeyt’un in order to create a divine firewall of protection around the entire city." Sadly, this Biblical force field failed to repel the invading Turks, and the Gospels were given to "descendants of an Armenian royal family" for safekeeping in 1915. The family in possession of the magical text did survive the genocide, as did the book itself. It was eventually returned to the Church in 1928. But because the manuscript had been in limbo for over a decade, in 1948 the Church sent it to a trusted source for authentication. When it was returned, seven pages were discovered to have been torn out.

T'oros Roslin (active:1256 - 1268)
Canon Tables of the Zeyt' un Gospels, 1256.
Tempera colors, gold paint,
and ink on
parchment.

(Image Courtesy Of The J. Paul Getty Museum.)

The identity of the thief remains a mystery, but the pages eventually ended up in the hands of an unidentified private collector in the United States. In 1994, the pages were lent to the Morgan Library and Museum in New York City for display in an exhibition, Treasures in Heaven: Armenian Illuminated Manuscripts. Here they were seen by representatives of the Getty, who subsequently purchased them for the Museum's antiquity collection.

The Getty's website describes the seven pages of the Zeyt’un Gospels held in their collection as: "made in the scriptorium at Hromklay for Katholikos Constantine I in 1256, [they] are the earliest signed work of T'oros Roslin, the most accomplished illuminator and scribe in Armenia in the 1200s. These canon tables were separated from the manuscript at some point in the past and eventually acquired by the Getty Museum, while the rest of the manuscript is in a public collection in Armenia." The vague language used to describe the history of these pages makes it sound like they just accidentally slipped out of the binding and got lost. As if that happens all the time. Churches just lose track of the most important pages of their sacred religious texts, and they turn up in a museum 7,000 miles away on the other side of the Atlantic sixty years later.

T'oros Roslin (active:1256 - 1268)
Canon Tables of the Zeyt' un Gospels, 1256.
Tempera colors, gold paint,
and ink on
parchment.

(Image Courtesy Of The J. Paul Getty Museum.)

For it's part, the Getty claims it is "confident that it has legal ownership of these pages, known as Canon Tables, which have been widely published, studied and exhibited." That the pages were purchased only "after a thorough review of their provenance," and that "the lawsuit is groundless and should be dismissed." All of which might be easier to swallow if the Getty hadn't already had numerous legal problems, with both Italy and Greece demanding the museum return looted antiquities. In fact, a former curator of antiquities at the Getty has been the object of a five-year-long (and counting) criminal trial in Italy, charged with conspiracy to traffic in illicit antiquities and receiving stolen goods.

The Getty has also been known to indulge in what has become a fairly common practice for museums unsure of the ownership background of ancient works: "antiquity laundering." Pieces with shady backgrounds start out in private hands for some years, then are loaned to a prestigious museum for a high profile exhibition. Photos and descriptions of the pieces are published in an exhibit catalog, and presto!, provenance is established. Of course this never accounts for how the items were removed from their country of origin in the first place. The Getty has in at least one case purchased an entire collection of questionable antiquities from a private collector, with the only published "provenance" being two exhibit catalogs produced when the items were on loan: one from the Cleveland Museum of Art, and the other from (you guessed it) the Getty itself.

T'oros Roslin (active:1256 - 1268)
Canon Tables of the Zeyt' un Gospels, 1256.
Tempera colors, gold paint,
and ink on
parchment.

(Image Courtesy Of The J. Paul Getty Museum.)

But the Getty is far from the only museum getting its hands dirty through dubious dealings in the antiquities market. According to a June 3, 2010 article in the New York Times, a just released 14-page legal notice from the public prosecutor’s office in Rome, states that J. Michael Padgett, antiquities curator at the Princeton University Art Museum, is the focus of a criminal investigation for "the illegal export and laundering" of Italian archaeological objects. And many other American museums have recently repatriated antiquities with questionable provenance to their homelands to avoid facing the kind of legal action now plaguing the former Getty curator.

T'oros Roslin (active:1256 - 1268)
Canon Tables of the Zeyt' un Gospels, 1256.
Tempera colors, gold paint,
and ink on
parchment.

(Image Courtesy Of The J. Paul Getty Museum.)

The former director of the Getty, John Walsh, summed up the problems with the antiquities market best when he called it a field "not only full of dubious material but full of untruthfulness and deceit of every kind." Part One of this piece dealt with a return of a stolen national treasure where everyone involved came out smelling like a rose. However the court case between the Western Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church of America and the J. Paul Getty Museum turns out, it seems certain somebody is going to wind up stinking like the famous corpse flower at another California temple of the arts, The Huntington Library.
__________

Monday, June 7, 2010

The Case of the Purloined Letter and The (Allegedly) Stolen Bible, Part One.

An Excerpt From The Purloined Letter, Written By Rene Descartes In 1641.
(Image Courtesy Of Haverford College.)

Two institutions, two libraries, two allegations that each holds a unique and priceless literary document which is stolen property. Two American archives each housing a cultural treasure from, in one case, France; and in the other, Armenia. Two very different reactions to requests that their respective ill-gotten gains be repatriated to the country which believes itself to be the rightful owner.

One institution has a spotless reputation for honorable conduct; the other's name is already mud-stained by earlier theft allegations from Italy and Greece. One case already has a happy ending; the other seems to be headed for years of expensive court battles. Two cases which exemplify the good, the bad, and the ugly in the sometimes shady world of collecting rare documents.

The Interior Of The Magill Library At Haverford College Library Ca. 1915.
(Image Courtesy of Haverford College, Gift Of Helen Sharpless.)

In this good news, bad news story, Part One is the story of the White Knight: Haverford College. Haverford is an elite, private college located in a suburb of Philadelphia. Founded by members of the Orthodox Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in 1833, it is a small school with big prestige. Despite never having an enrollment of more than 1,200 students, Haverford has produced four Nobel Prize winners, four MacArthur Fellows, ten Marshall Scholars, and nineteen Rhodes Scholars. Famous former students include writers Nicholson Baker and Lloyd Alexander, and artist Maxfield Parrish.

A Distinguished Gathering Of Students And Faculty In Alumni Hall,
Haverford College's First Library, In 1865.
(Image Courtesy Of Haverford College.)

Haverford College in also unique for being governed by an honor code (.pdf format) which was created by the student body and is administered by them to this day. The code applies to both academics and personal behavior, not with specific rules but rather with a pledge to be respectful, trustworthy, and caring. This brings us to The Case of the Purloined Letter, in which the faculty of Haverford behaves with the same grace that is expected of the honor-bound students.

Rene Descartes Signature (lower left) On The Purloined Letter.
(Image courtesy Of Haverford College.)

In late 2009, the head of special collections at Haverford's library, John Anderies, began to inventory documents from a large collection donated by 1864 alumnus and autograph collector, Charles Roberts. These unique items were to be digitized and made available online. When the inventory was posted on Haverford's website, a Dutch scholar, Erik-Jan Bos, immediately recognized one document as part of a collection of thousands which had been stolen from a French library in the mid-eighteenth century. It was an irreplaceable handwritten letter authored by French philosopher and mathematician Rene Descartes (1596-1650) on May 27, 1641, outlining the contents of his most famous book, Meditationes de prima philosophia (1641).

Notorious Book and Document Thief Count Guglielmo Libri (1803–1869).
Professor of Mathematics at the Collège de France and

Secretary of the Committee for the General Catalogue
of Manuscripts In French Public Libraries.
(Image Courtesy of Haverford College.)

The Descartes letter had been pilfered from a French library by one of the most notorious document and book thieves in history, Count Guglielmo Libri Carucci dalla Sommaja (1803–1869). This former government inspector of French libraries stole some 30,000 rare items from the very libraries he was entrusted with protecting. (And probably several thousand more from a previous similar position he held in Italy.) Libri escaped to England with his booty, and though convicted of grand theft in absentia, he was never apprehended, and lived by selling off the stolen documents and books to unsuspecting, or uncaring, collectors. Thus Haverford grad Charles Roberts purchased the Descartes letter, unaware of it's illicit origins.

Charles Roberts, Haverford Class Of 1864. He Bought The Descartes letter,
Unaware It Was Stolen. His Widow Donated It To Haverford In 1902.
(Image Courtesy of Haverford College.)

So how did the faculty of Haverford College, with their tradition of Quaker morality and personal honor, react to the news that they were in possession of booty from one of history's most infamous book thieves? Exactly like the valiant White Knight in a medieval romance: "We're not in the business of keeping stolen property," college President Stephen Emerson said. After a brief investigation confirming the letter as stolen, Emerson contacted Gabriel de Broglie, chancellor of the Institut de France, to facilitate the return of the irreplaceable piece of cultural history to its rightful owner. For his part de Broglie was so pleased with this "gesture [that] honors you and exemplifies the depth of moral values that you instill in your students," that he insisted on giving Haverford a 15,000 Euro ($19,000) reward.

Portrait Of Rene Descartes By A Follower Of Franz Hals.
Oil On Canvas, Ca. 1649-1700.

(Image Courtesy Of Wikipedia Commons.)

The Tale of the Purloined Letter shows what happens when respect, honor, and gratitude govern the rare document trade. France regains a national treasure, and Haverford College further cements its reputation for integrity. The Institute de France graciously rewards a library that does the right thing without hesitation, and Haverford uses the reward money to establish a scholarship for the study of French language and culture. Its a big win for everyone involved in an ownership dispute that easily could have gone bad. And just how ugly could the case of the purloined letter have been? Find out in Part Two of this piece in Wednesday's Booktryst: The Case of the (Allegedly) Stolen Bible.
__________

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Cops Nab "Tome Raider" Two years on the Lam

William Jacques, the notorious "Tome Raider," was arrested in Selby, North Yorkshire on Christmas Day 2009 after eluding the police for more than two years. He will appear at City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court accused of stealing antique horticultural books from the Royal Horticultural Society's London library.

The thirteen volumes are said to be worth about £50,000. It is alleged Jacques stole them by signing in to the library under the false name of Mr Santoro and then hiding them under his jacket. "Mr. Santoro" was a new alias; Jacques is also known by the nom de theft, David Fletcher.


Jacques, 40, a former Cambridge student who plundered rare book collections worth up to £1.1 million from libraries faced a lengthy jail term when first arrested in 2002. 
 
He had stolen hundreds of first edition books and sold them at auction houses in the UK.

At the turn of the century (21st), the former chartered accountant was convicted by a jury of 19 counts of theft from the British Library, the Cambridge University Library and the London Library dating from October 1996 to May 1999. Jacques was jailed for four years for that offense, which constituted one of the biggest hauls in legal history.

After he got out, he started up again, this time as Santoro.

Jacques will likely proclaim his innocence, declaring that he only eluded the authorities to search for the real culprit, a mysterious one-armed man.
 
Subscribe to BOOKTRYST by Email